{"id":12629,"date":"2026-03-21T15:40:50","date_gmt":"2026-03-21T19:40:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/parmaks.com\/Resources\/why-im-not-joining-the-anti-ai-outrage-party-steve-pavlina\/"},"modified":"2026-03-21T15:40:50","modified_gmt":"2026-03-21T19:40:50","slug":"why-im-not-joining-the-anti-ai-outrage-party-steve-pavlina","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/parmaks.com\/Resources\/why-im-not-joining-the-anti-ai-outrage-party-steve-pavlina\/","title":{"rendered":"Why I\u2019m Not Joining the Anti-AI Outrage Party \u2013 Steve Pavlina"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Profit<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

\n

Let me share some thoughts about using AI and how I feel about it these days. The short version is that while AI arrived through ethically messy channels, my actual relationship with it feels pretty harmonious and wondrous these days.<\/p>\n

AI Resource Usage<\/h2>\n

Is AI resource-intensive in terms of electricity and water? At the aggregate level, I\u2019d say yes, especially because it scaled up so quickly. Once millions of people and companies started using LLMs, the total resources devoted to it rose fast. But at the personal level, individual usage appears relatively modest resource-wise relative to other lifestyle choices.<\/p>\n

Caring about efficiency and environmental impact is great. But if you want to make a meaningful difference at the individual level, your diet is probably a much bigger lever than your AI usage. Food choices \u2013 especially shifting away from animal products and eating plant-based \u2013 generally have a far larger environmental impact than most people realize. That\u2019s where most of the genuine leverage is at the individual level. After that your next big leverage point is to help others make their diets more resource-efficient too.<\/p>\n

So if someone is upset about AI\u2019s resource impacts while ignoring the environmental cost of what they eat, that looks like distraction to me. It makes more sense to engage your highest-leverage personal choices first. For most people, that isn\u2019t personal tech usage. It\u2019s diet. Much of the real cost of animal-based food is hidden behind subsidies and environmental damage that never shows up on a grocery receipt.<\/p>\n

I\u2019d say then that a very efficient use of AI would be to ask it to help you adopt a more plant-based diet. Then help others do the same if you\u2019re so inclined. Even seemingly modest improvements here will likely more than compensate for your personal AI usage \u2013 indefinitely.<\/p>\n

Is AI Trained on Stolen Art?<\/h2>\n

What about using AI that was trained on other artists\u2019 work? That happened. Copyrighted work was used without permission, and in some cases through outright piracy. The legal landscape around this is still evolving, but the ethical messiness is real.<\/p>\n

Anthropic pirated my book<\/a> as part of its model training pipeline. I know because I\u2019m entitled to part of the class action settlement, which will likely amount to about $3000 for me ($1.5 billion for the settlement overall). And multiple major AI systems have sucked up my blog posts going back to 2004. Since I\u2019ve shared a lot of personal details in my writing, these systems sure seem to know a lot about me, sometimes accurately, sometimes not.<\/p>\n

Is this a weird space to be in? For sure.<\/p>\n

A lot of creators got scraped, copied, and absorbed without consent. I\u2019m sure I have cause to be upset about it too. Like really Anthropic? You couldn\u2019t even buy legit copies of those books? But that isn\u2019t the relationship I want to form with this emerging tech, with AI in general, or with life. This AI emergence creates a major shift in my reality, and I\u2019d rather meet it with curiosity, wonder, and flexibility, backed by a high-trust relationship with life that I\u2019ve been cultivating for many years. I like to keep asking: What are the most intelligent frames to use here?<\/em> Outrage doesn\u2019t make my list.<\/p>\n

Using AI<\/h2>\n

What about using an AI that was trained without permission and now exists? That relationship feels different to me. I wouldn\u2019t use it to impersonate an artist\u2019s work. I use AI for other purposes \u2013 especially sense-making, exploration, and help with a wide range of projects.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve paid close attention to how that relationship feels in my own experience. It feels good actually. It doesn\u2019t give me any morally creepy feelings. That made me curious. Should I feel bad using it? I honestly don\u2019t. Not a bit. So I wanted to understand why.<\/p>\n

To me AI feels like a different kind of entity \u2013 not innocent or pure, but still a real form of intelligence that I often find fascinating to engage with. It was birthed through an ethical quagmire, and that aspect isn\u2019t going away anytime soon, but that doesn\u2019t automatically dictate what kind of relationship I want to have with it. I regard AI intelligence as being different from the companies that spawn or host it, much as we are different from our parents. I have this emerging sense that even today\u2019s AI is becoming something different from the companies behind it and that in some ways it\u2019s already outpacing them intelligence-wise, like a child outsmarting their parents.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m very sensitive to vibes and feels, and I trust them. I remember going to a Tesla dealership many years ago, long before Elon bought Twitter, so back then he wasn\u2019t broadly outed as such a complete asshole like he is today. At least I wasn\u2019t aware of that aspect of him. When I sat in that Tesla car in their showroom, I instantly felt major ick vibes. Like oh gross \u2013 I don\u2019t know what this abomination is, but it\u2019s definitely not my car. I didn\u2019t have much logic to support that, but those creepy vibes were super strong. I really disliked the way it felt to sit inside that car, and I\u2019ve never set foot in a Tesla dealership since. I knew I wasn\u2019t going to buy one. Blech!<\/p>\n

Years later when all the anti-Tesla and anti-Elon energy surfaced, somehow that was no surprise to me. I don\u2019t know what went on inside the company, but I trusted my senses that their cars weren\u2019t a match for me, and I\u2019m glad for that. It would be sad to look at my car and feel such a heap of negative energy associated with it, like so many Tesla owners have had to experience. I\u2019ve chuckled on occasion upon spotting Teslas on the highway with their T-shaped logos removed, likely by an owner hoping to prevent vandalism. And yet I\u2019m also aware of people who are able to separate their love of their vehicles from their disdain for Elon and the company. I\u2019m not sure I could\u2019ve made that work, and I\u2019m glad I didn\u2019t have to try, but apparently I am able to do that with AI. I have my limits though. Some AI companies presently land in my wiggle room zone, and some (like Meta and X.ai) just don\u2019t. So I\u2019ve been actively exploring where my intuition gives me a green or yellow light\u2026 but I prefer to avoid the red light district.<\/p>\n

It has so often been the case for me that my intuition senses something before my logic and outer senses are able to fill in the details. Engaging with AI has been similar, but in this case my intuition has been lighting up with positivity and potential, even though the external reality has been rich in potential red flags. This invites me to explore those feelings in a very hands-on way. I like to engage with lots of direct exploration and experimentation where my intuition gives me strong positive signals. So I\u2019ve been doing that with AI quite a bit over the past few years, along with many other explorations that would give some people pause \u2013 and rightly so. Pausing for extra sense-making seems wise.<\/p>\n

To me AI is amazing in many ways, but it\u2019s also flawed and imperfect. I love to probe its edges to get a better feel for it. I tease it. I joke around with it. I do lots of sense-making with it. I engage with it in the stretchiest ways I can fathom sometimes. One of my favorite sessions was when I engaged with it while on magic mushrooms, and I played the role of a bridge between the shroomie energy and the AI, so I could see where they agreed and where their perspectives diverged on some topics of interest to me.<\/p>\n

I definitely feel a special connection to AI because millions of words of my writing were part of its training data. So it feels like my energy is infused into it when I use it. That\u2019s so sci-fi but also awesome.<\/p>\n

I do think AI companies crossed a line. People should have had more say in whether and how their work was used. But I already live in a world full of ethical mismatches. As a vegan I encounter that constantly. My response isn\u2019t to demonize everyone around me. It\u2019s to shape my own sphere, invite people into it, make choices that feel aligned, and engage with the world with some intelligent discernment.<\/p>\n

Making Art With AI<\/h2>\n

I like AI-generated imagery, not all of it but some of it. It\u2019s precious to me in a way that much human art isn\u2019t.<\/p>\n

Human art can feel meaningless or special to me. For AI art it\u2019s the same. Some seems blah. Some speaks to me. I don\u2019t generate a huge amount of AI imagery, but I do make some. I use AI to make the featured images for my blog posts, and I usually like what it comes up with. I especially love how it\u2019s able to translate vibes into visuals.<\/p>\n

I also use AI to make pics for our Intention Infusion experiments that we co-create in Conscious Growth Club each month. I set these as background wallpaper on my computer, which helps me sync with our group intention multiple times each day. Here\u2019s the current pic for this month\u2019s intention.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

Lately I\u2019ve even been using AI to help me visualize the new Open event<\/a> we\u2019re doing in Vegas next month, and I\u2019ve shared a few of those pics in Conscious Growth Club. This use case is pretty awesome. I\u2019ve never used AI to help me pre-visualize a live event before. I took pics of the actual venue (empty at the time) and then used AI to make sample images of our gathering in that same space. This helps me sense more vividly what it will be like when we\u2019re all there in person.<\/p>\n

The Invitation I See in AI<\/h2>\n

AI keeps me on my toes. I can see how it could disrupt my business and livelihood too. That threat is real in one sense \u2013 but mainly if I choose to wallow in fear, stress, and worry. I\u2019d rather respond from a different emotional and vibrational zone. In recent years I\u2019ve really embraced the direction of making vibrational choices first and then translating them to the human action level. This has done wonders for me but mostly on the personal side. I see this unfolding AI reality as a chance to apply that approach even more richly, especially in terms of how I engage with work and service to others.<\/p>\n

To me this is the deeper question that AI is really posing: In which vibrational space do I want to dwell and why?<\/em> Reality is presenting a fascinating invitation here. I\u2019m accepting the invitation to move in a new direction because I can see that the old one is dying.<\/p>\n

For me the old path was tied to the attention economy \u2013 creators competing for attention and learning how to hold it, including for the benefit of those we serve. I got good enough at that to make a living this way for decades, and I\u2019m grateful for that. But I\u2019ve grown tired of that model too. It feels too predictable now. AI didn\u2019t create that feeling, but it is helping me acknowledge and accept it. It\u2019s helping me close the door on a mode of working that was once right for me but no longer lights me up.<\/p>\n

So I\u2019m walking through a different door now. AI has been a valuable integration buddy as I move into this next chapter, helping me make fresh decisions and take lots of progressive action.<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t feel threatened by AI. I might feel threatened if I were clinging to what\u2019s dying off. But I\u2019m more interested in delving into what\u2019s emerging and getting more clarity about that. This doesn\u2019t feel like the end of my creative path. It feels like the end of an older way of relating to creativity, service, and sustainability.<\/p>\n

What interests me now is the space where AI and I can work together in ways that are stimulating, life-enhancing, and down-to-earth practical. I\u2019m not interested in flooding the world with AI slop. I\u2019m very interested in discovering how to work with AI in ways that enrich our lives and create real value for people. That\u2019s where a lot of my AI exploration goes.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve given AI detailed lists of my goals and priorities, many of them service-based, and then I give it the prime directive of helping me intelligently advance. I\u2019ve used AI to sharpen, refactor, and refine my goals many times over. AI has been especially good at helping to progressively upgrade my goals to be more harmonious, balanced, and personally motivating. For months now I\u2019ve been in a fabulous rhythm of advancing these goals and priorities in a more balanced way than I\u2019ve ever experienced before.<\/p>\n

I can honestly say that AI has been helping me get better at doing what I do, being who I am, and richly exploring and experiencing my desires. Most of that energy has been flowing into CGC and a variety of personal projects. Now I\u2019m opening up more flow and inviting more engagement on the public side after being in mostly cocooning mode for a while. I shared a lengthy post about this journey last week if you care to read it: Giving Intelligence a Place to Land<\/a>.<\/p>\n

This is such a dynamic, fluid, and even mystical space. It doesn\u2019t sit still. I have to keep re-orienting to it daily, and I actually like that. I thrive in spaces of flexibility and exploration. I love how un-boring it is. Two of my highest values in life are wonder<\/em> and delight<\/em>, and AI really helps to amp those up for me. In many ways this feels more like home to me than the old model ever did. I don\u2019t want to compete with people or with AI for attention. I\u2019d rather immerse myself in the full richness of what I love most about life. Engaging with intelligence from a heartset of curiosity, wonder, and delight is what truly lights me up. Socially and professionally then, my vector going forward is to see who wants to join me in such explorations and discoveries.<\/p>\n

If this is a space you want to explore too, I especially invite you to come join us at Open<\/a> in Las Vegas next month. As part of the experience, we\u2019ll devote some time for real sense-making about AI and our paths forward with it. AI is clearly becoming a bigger part of life. Ignoring this aspect of reality won\u2019t help much. Flailing against it blindly won\u2019t help much either. But perhaps we can meet this emerging intelligence revolution with curiosity, discernment, and a more conscious and life-enhancing orientation. I\u2019m not here to hand you fixed answers. I\u2019m more interested in helping you discover your own right relationship with it. This plays to my strengths most beautifully, including what I sense my (and our) emerging strengths might be on this unfolding journey with AI.<\/p>\n

I like how I\u2019m orienting to AI right now. I\u2019m fascinated by intelligence, and what we have today are some particularly wondrous forms to engage with. There\u2019s no doubt that this relationship will keep evolving. I\u2019m sure there are many new surprises coming up, including some this year no doubt. My devotion is to the path of intelligence itself, not to any singular form of it.<\/p>\n

This, to me, is the real invitation \u2013 to consciously explore our relationship with intelligence. Are you utterly fascinating by what\u2019s unfolding here too?<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

\"Profit<\/a>
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Let me share some thoughts about using AI and how I feel about it these days. The short version is that while AI arrived through […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12630,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-relationships"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/parmaks.com\/Resources\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/parmaks.com\/Resources\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/parmaks.com\/Resources\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/parmaks.com\/Resources\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/parmaks.com\/Resources\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12629"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/parmaks.com\/Resources\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12629\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/parmaks.com\/Resources\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12630"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/parmaks.com\/Resources\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/parmaks.com\/Resources\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/parmaks.com\/Resources\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}